In der Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts gab es diese sehr fleißig Smart, ergiebig, lustig, ancient and wise people called the jews.
Sie sind vom Aussterben bedrohte Arten jetzt. These people underestimated their government’s hatred against them.
Auf die gleiche Weise heute, gibt es Kapitalisten. Most of those underestimate others’ hatred over them.
Die Juden unterschätzt Nazis "Hass gegen sie. Sie denken, sie nicht bekommen verschraubt. "Wir sind für sie nützlich. Warum sollten sie uns töten?"Sie sagte zu sich selbst. Sie konnte erkennen, dass:
1. Die mittelmäßigen hasse den Smart. That’s why Nazis hated jews.
2. The lazy hate the diligent.
3. The unproductive hate the productive.
4. The less competitive hate those who out compete them. The less competitive always want to prevent those better than them from reaching their full potential.
The same way most people fail to realize that:
1. Mediocre men do not want women to only pick the rich. That’s why they prohibit prostitution.
2. Singles do not want people with mates to keep getting mates. That’s why they prohibit group marriage, polyandry and polygamy.
3. Ugly women do not want women to be judged by their beauty. That’s why they prohibit porn.
4. The less competitive hate those who out compete them or have potential to do so. The less competitive always want to prevent those better than them from achieving their full potential.
All these are half obvious already. Yet most people don’t know.
The fascists justified killing jews by claiming that the jews are inferior anyway. If it were true, why not just let the market decide? Not a rhetorical question. Inferiority is a very vague concept. In a very reasonable sense, the truth is actually the opposite.
The fascists also justify prohibition of prostitution by claiming that prostitution is such a bad deal no women could possibly want that anyway. If it were true, why not let the market decide? Not a rhetorical question. Bad deal is a very vague concept. In a very reasonable sense, the truth is actually the opposite.
So the Nazis pulled out a trick. “Work will set you free,” said bigots. “Just register your arms and wear star of David band for ease of identification,” said the Nazi.
All those seem pretty innocent.
Yet something was suspicious. What business government has in identifying who were jewish and who were not? They should have asked.
The same way, religious bigots and feminazis are pulling tricks. “Get married first before having sex,” said religious bigots. “Women are not sex objects and should not be judged solely by their beauty,” said ugly feminazis.
All those seem pretty innocent.
Yet something is suspicious. What business does government have in regulating marriage?
What business does ugly women have in controlling how we think? When men think of women as sex object, we usually mean the pretty right? So why the ugly care?
But many jews didn’t see that the Nazi wanted their extermination. What else could they have wanted? By registering their guns they are easy to disarm. By wearing stars they are easy to identify. And by being in concentration camp they are easy to exterminate.
The same way many of us do not see that those wanting us to get married want nothing but our extermination and suffering. What else do they want?
By getting married government has power to define what marriage mean. Government can ration mates in equal share for everyone by allowing people to only pick singles.
By getting married judges have justification to prosecute the rich with hefty alimony. The justification, as ridiculous as it sound, is that you agreed to that indirectly when you get married.
By getting married people make it easy for government to screw them.
Little did the jews know that hatred against them would matter far more in concentration camp than outside.
Outside concentration camp, hatred against jews matter much less. The jews can still fight, flee, or run.
Inside concentration camp, they’re toasted. Literally.
The same way, little people know, that hatred of those who are not competitive are far less influential outside marriage than inside marriage.
Outside marriage, you decide terms of your mating.
You can change partners, and hence providing incentive for the other side to behave fairly toward you. You can decide your own contract. You can share a more desirable partner, or be shared. It’s up to you.
Women typically can aim at far richer males outside marriage. Richer smart men can aim at more women outside marriage. It’s happening anyway thanks to higher and fairer income disparity globalization bring here.
Inside marriage, the will of all those bigots matters. A girl will have harder time aiming for the rich inside marriage. Rich males are afraid of having to pay big alimony and will not marry unless the women are smoking hot if at all. All those alimony laws are destructive only to the rich. Think about it.
Fascists ensure that rich men that still get married are pretty much screwed, hence ensuring that only the poor are available to marrying women.
Daher, the result
Read more about Beatty Chadwick here.
Check more here for more horror stories.
If you are a beautiful woman, getting laid by rich smart males willing to support you in exchange of sex or reproductive service is very easy. The richer the male, the more he wants you. Finding a male that are willing to risk going through those horrors for nothing is obviously difficult. The richer the male, the less likely he wants marriage.
Notice that genocide pictures I showed you above is quite typical. Most concentration camps’ Nazis to jews relationship does end up badly, for the jews. The experience are different. Some get burned, others get shot, another get gassed etc.
Notice that Beatty Chadwick’s case is quite typical. Most marriage does end up badly, for the productive. Experience varies. Some go to jail, others paid huge lifetime alimony, usw.
Perhaps the jews think that outside concentration camp, fascists can still kill them anyway. True.
But it’s much harder to kill them outside than inside.
As more and more are outside, fascism will starve and get weaker.
The same way many think that outside marriage, fascists can still control their life anyway. True.
Fascists can still prohibit prostitution. Fascist can still declare that cohabiting partners are married, hence effectively instituting forced marriage. Fascist can still prohibit prostitution. But fascists will have much harder time running your life outside marriage.
As more and more babies are born outside marriage, fascism will starve and get weaker.
A lot of hatred was there in the design of concentration camp. They got gas chambers, they got chains, they got guards with guns. Concentration camps were there to kill jews. Shouldn’t jews be suspicious?
Auf die gleiche Weise, a lot of hatred is there in the design of marital laws. They got life time alimony proportional to men’s income. They got judges ordering males to support kids that are not biologically his. Marriage laws are there to bankrupt rich smart males. Shouldn’t all rich males be suspicious?
Trust your government?
Remember genocide. Remember Beatty Chadwick.
Never again! we let fascists influencing who should stay in the gene pool. Yes in both cases (I am tired of writing the same thing twice), many will deny that.
Do not trust your government. The same government that claim to define what’s best for your kids are the same one that would send those same kids to ovens and roast them slowly. Just ask any holocaust survivor or Beatty Chadwick.
Never forget. Government sucks. Free market is awesome. Free market forever.
Warum Heirat ist wie KZ? is a post from: Free Market immer
Eingehende Suchbegriffe:
- powered by phpBB army drug rehab (22)
- phpBB, wie man eine Support-Gruppe laufen (10)